Why UPS Is Cutting 20,000 Jobs?: Beyond the Headlines

UPS Layoffs Amazon

Table of Contents

Toggle

When a major company like UPS announces cutting 20,000 jobs, it’s easy to assume it’s just another sign of a struggling economy or the fallout from global trade tensions. But the real story is more nuanced and driven by internal strategies, not just external pressures. In this post, we’ll dive into the why behind UPS’s decision, exploring their deliberate shift away from Amazon, their aggressive push toward automation, and how tariffs fit (or don’t fit) into the picture. By unpacking this, we’ll see how a company’s internal choices can ripple out, reshaping entire industries in ways that headlines often miss.

---

The Big Picture: Not Your Typical Layoff Story

At first glance, a layoff of 20,000 jobs at a logistics giant like UPS might scream “economic downturn” or “trade war fallout.” After all, headlines love to pin big moves on broad trends. But UPS is telling a different story. According to a CNN Business article, the company is pointing to two internal drivers:

• A strategic “glide-down” to reduce business with Amazon, one of their biggest clients.
• A major investment in automation is reshaping how their facilities operate.

These aren’t knee-jerk reactions to a shaky economy. They’re calculated moves to boost profitability and efficiency, even if they come with significant human cost. Let’s break it down.

---

Part 1: The Amazon “Glide-Down” Strategy

What’s Happening?

UPS is intentionally scaling back its business with Amazon, aiming to cut it in half by mid-2026. This isn’t a small tweak—Amazon is one of UPS’s largest clients, and this “glide-down” plan, announced earlier this year, is already in motion. Last quarter, UPS’s Amazon package volume dropped by 16%, a steeper decline than even the company expected.

Why Step Back?

The reasoning boils down to one word: profitability. UPS CEO Carol Tomé has been clear: a significant portion of their Amazon business simply isn’t profitable enough. According to Tomé, some of these deliveries don’t align well with UPS’s network, creating inefficiencies in how packages flow through their system. In a 2023 earnings call, she emphasised that the low-margin business was dragging down the company’s overall financial health.

This isn’t just about numbers—it’s about long-term strategy. By reducing reliance on a single client, even a giant like Amazon, UPS is diversifying its revenue streams and focusing on higher-margin deliveries. It’s a bold move, but it’s already reshaping their operations.

The Ripple Effect

Fewer Amazon packages mean less strain on UPS’s infrastructure. But it also means they need fewer facilities to handle the volume. As a result, UPS plans to close 73 locations across the U.S. by the end of June. That’s a massive operational shift, and it’s a direct consequence of this strategic pivot.

Key Stats: Amazon Glide-Down	Details
Target Reduction	50% of Amazon business by mid-2026
Recent Drop	16% decline in Amazon package volume last quarter
Facility Closures	73 locations by June

---

Part 2: The Automation Push

What’s Changing?

The second driver behind the job cuts is UPS’s aggressive investment in automation. Across the logistics industry, companies are leaning into technology to streamline operations, but UPS is accelerating this trend. They’re automating tasks like:

• Sorting packages
• Applying labels
• Loading and unloading trucks

Their goal? To integrate technology into every corner of their operations, with a target of 400 facilities being partially or fully automated.

The Link to Job Cuts

Automation isn’t just about speed—it’s about reducing the need for human labor. Tomé was upfront about this, stating that automation would “lessen our dependency on labor.” This isn’t a subtle shift; it’s a fundamental change in how UPS operates. By replacing manual tasks with machines, they’re cutting costs and boosting efficiency, but at the expense of thousands of jobs.

Why Now?

Automation isn’t new, but UPS’s urgency is. The logistics industry is fiercely competitive, and companies like FedEx and DHL are also investing heavily in tech. According to a McKinsey report, automation can reduce operating costs in logistics by up to 30%. For UPS, staying ahead means doubling down on these technologies, even if it means tough choices for their workforce.

Key Stats: Automation Push	Details
Target Facilities	400 partially or fully automated
Tasks Automated	Sorting, labeling, loading/unloading
Impact	Reduced dependency on human labor

---

The Union’s Response: Teamsters Take a Stand

With 20,000 jobs on the line, the Teamsters union, which represents many of UPS’s hourly workers, isn’t staying quiet. Union president Sean O’Brien has vowed to fight layoffs that affect their members, emphasizing job security for the rank-and-file. Interestingly, O’Brien hinted that the union might not oppose cuts to corporate management, focusing their defence on frontline workers.

UPS, for its part, is playing by the book. Spokesperson Glenn Zaccara stated that the company will honour its current agreement with the Teamsters, ensuring layoffs align with contractual terms. It’s a tense standoff, but one that reflects the broader tug-of-war between labor and corporate strategy.

---

The Tariff Question: A Side Note, Not the Main Story

Trade tariffs have been a hot topic, with a 10% tariff on many imports and up to 145% on certain Chinese goods. These have undoubtedly affected UPS’s business, as higher costs ripple through global supply chains. But here’s the key: UPS isn’t blaming tariffs for the job cuts.

Carol Tomé acknowledged that tariffs have “some impact,” but she stressed that their customers aren’t abandoning China entirely. She also highlighted the uncertainty around tariffs, noting, “Candidly, there’s so much uncertainty around the China orders. We don’t know if it will stick.” This ambiguity makes it hard to pin the layoffs on trade policy alone.

Instead, tariffs are a secondary factor. UPS expects a revenue dip in Q2, partly due to tariffs and partly due to the Amazon pullback. But they haven’t revised their full-year financial forecast yet, suggesting confidence in their broader strategy. According to a Statista report, tariffs have increased logistics costs by 5-10% for major carriers, but UPS seems to view this as a manageable headwind, not a dealbreaker.

Key Stats: Tariff Impact	Details
Current Tariffs	10% on many imports, up to 145% on Chinese goods
Revenue Impact	Expected Q2 dip, full-year forecast unchanged
UPS Stance	Tariffs secondary to internal strategy

---

The Consumer Angle: Mixed Signals

What about the bigger economic picture? UPS’s take on consumer sentiment offers some clues. Tomé noted that consumer confidence is down compared to earlier this year, reflecting caution amid economic uncertainty. But she quickly added that “the consumer is still pretty healthy,” pointing to resilience in spending.

This mixed signal aligns with broader data. A Forbes article cites that U.S. retail sales grew by 2.1% in 2024, despite inflation concerns. For UPS, this suggests that while tariffs and economic jitters might slow things down, consumer demand isn’t collapsing—another reason why the job cuts are more about strategy than a reaction to a failing economy.

---

Why This Matters: A Lesson in Looking Deeper

So, what’s the takeaway? UPS’s decision to cut 20,000 jobs isn’t just a response to a tough economy or tariff woes. It’s a deliberate repositioning, driven by two big moves:

• Shrinking Amazon business to focus on profitability.
• Embracing automation to cut costs and stay competitive.

These choices reflect a broader truth: sometimes, a company’s internal strategies—like chasing efficiency or rethinking client relationships—can have a bigger impact than the economic headlines we’re used to. It’s a reminder to dig beyond the surface.

For readers, this story hits home in a few ways. Maybe you’ve seen automation creeping into your own industry, replacing tasks you used to do. Or perhaps you’ve watched big companies shift priorities, leaving workers to navigate the fallout. UPS’s moves are a microcosm of these trends, and they challenge us to ask: What’s driving change in the industries we care about? Are there hidden strategies at play that we’re not seeing?

---

Connecting the Dots: What’s Next?

As UPS closes facilities and ramps up automation, the logistics industry is at a turning point. Other companies will likely follow suit, balancing tech investments with workforce needs. For workers, this means adapting to a landscape where skills in tech or specialized logistics could be key. For consumers, it might mean faster deliveries but also higher costs as companies pass on tariff-related expenses.

This story also invites us to question other “straightforward” news. The next time you see a headline about layoffs or industry shifts, pause and wonder: Is it really just the economy, or is there a bigger, company-specific strategy at play? By looking deeper, we can better understand the forces shaping our world.

FAQ